AI in creative & media production
AI now generates images, video, music, and written content at a quality level that was unthinkable two years ago. For businesses, this isn't about replacing your creative team — it's about speed and cost. A marketing campaign that required a photographer, a copywriter, and a designer can now be prototyped in hours. The business decision: where does AI-generated content work fine (internal docs, social drafts), and where does your brand demand human craft?
Go deeper
Your marketing coordinator just spent three weeks and $8,000 getting a photographer, a designer, and a copywriter to produce assets for your new service line launch. Your competitor posted a similar campaign two days after announcing theirs — AI-generated visuals, AI-drafted copy, human-reviewed and polished in an afternoon. Both campaigns perform about the same with customers. One cost 20x more and took 15x longer.
The trap most companies fall into is an all-or-nothing stance: either 'AI will replace our creative work' or 'AI creative output is garbage.' The reality is task-dependent. AI-generated internal training materials? Nobody cares if it's AI. AI-generated customer-facing brand photography? Your audience might notice, and your brand might suffer. The smart move is mapping every content type to a quality threshold and using AI where the threshold is 'good enough' and humans where it's 'must be distinctive.'
Questions to ask
- How much do we spend annually on content production, broken down by type (social, training, sales collateral, brand)?
- Which content types could we prototype with AI and refine with a human editor, cutting cycle time by 80%?
- Do we have brand guidelines specific enough to brief an AI tool, or are they only in our designer's head?